Bayne v. Garrett
Texas Supreme Court
Error from San Augustine. Tried below before the Hon. Archibald W. O. Hicks.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
There has been a great deal more difficulty in reading this record and understanding it, than is pr esented by the law of the case. The Clerk seems to have been experimenting upon how much perpléxity he could throw into his transcript; and if so, he has certainly been eminently suceesful. Instead of the transcript presenting the different compo nent parts in their proper consecutive connection, it has the appearance of each having been written on a separate piece of paper, and then well shuffled together, after which he has transcribed from each in the order they were left by the shuffler.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Blackwell v. BlackwellTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Waterman Lumber & Supply Co. v. RobinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Stone v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Nettles v. SegalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.