Legal Opinion

People v. Irizarry

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1992PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*892The police officer’s observations of the defendant in this case provided him with an "objective credible reason” to approach the defendant and ask him questions about his destination and identity (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181 [decided today]; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). The police officer’s request to search the defendant’s bag was improper, however, because it was not based on a "founded suspicion that criminal activity [was] afoot” (People v Hollman, supra, at 191; People v De Bour, supra,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. OldacreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API