People v. Irizarry
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*892The police officer’s observations of the defendant in this case provided him with an "objective credible reason” to approach the defendant and ask him questions about his destination and identity (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181 [decided today]; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). The police officer’s request to search the defendant’s bag was improper, however, because it was not based on a "founded suspicion that criminal activity [was] afoot” (People v Hollman, supra, at 191; People v De Bour, supra,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. OldacreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.