Acquard v. Acquard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Motion for leave to appeal and for a stay denied. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Family Court, it is well settled that, absent extraordinary or exigent circumstances, temporary custody should not be transferred without an evidentiary hearing in a proceeding in which there are controverted allegations (see, Kronenberger v Kronenberger, 204 AD2d 1059; see also, Hizme v Hizme, 212 AD2d 580). The transcript of the in camera interview supports the court’s implicit finding of exigent cir*1011cumstances in this case. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ. (Filed Oct. 31,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hizme v. HizmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kronenberger v. KronenbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Nicole JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- MORRISSEY, SR., DAVID M. v. MORRISSEY, DEBRA A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.