Legal Opinion

Acquard v. Acquard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Motion for leave to appeal and for a stay denied. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Family Court, it is well settled that, absent extraordinary or exigent circumstances, temporary custody should not be transferred without an evidentiary hearing in a proceeding in which there are controverted allegations (see, Kronenberger v Kronenberger, 204 AD2d 1059; see also, Hizme v Hizme, 212 AD2d 580). The transcript of the in camera interview supports the court’s implicit finding of exigent cir*1011cumstances in this case. Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ. (Filed Oct. 31,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hizme v. HizmeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Kronenberger v. KronenbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re Nicole JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. MORRISSEY, SR., DAVID M. v. MORRISSEY, DEBRA A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API