Legal Opinion

Claim of Hogan v. Onondaga County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The sole question is whether the State Industrial Board adopted the proper method for computing the amount of the average weekly wages of the claimant. Section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law provides three methods of arriving at the average weekly wages. The first method contemplates that the claimant shall have worked “ in the employment in which he was working at the time of the accident, whether for the same employer or not, during substantially the whole of the year immediately preceding his injury.” The claimant’s length of service in the employment was only four days and thus the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Littler v. George A. Fuller Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Mackin v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Kittle v. Town of KinderhookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. Cinek Coal & Feed Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Department of Parks v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  3. Claim of Damm v. Schreier Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Till v. Chautauqua Opportunities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Claim of Damm v. Schreier Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API