Sanders v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
From the circuit court of Webster county. Appellant was convicted of perjury, and appealed to the supreme court. The bill of exceptions was not signed by the judge, and no agreement of the attorneys in the case in the court below appears in the record certified to the supreme court, but after the record was filed in the supreme court, the following agreement was filed in the cause: £ £ In this case the record has been carefully examined by T. L. Lamb, acting for the district…
Read the full summary
From the circuit court of Webster county. Appellant was convicted of perjury, and appealed to the supreme court. The bill of exceptions was not signed by the judge, and no agreement of the attorneys in the case in the court below appears in the record certified to the supreme court, but after the record was filed in the supreme court, the following agreement was filed in the cause: £ £ In this case the record has been carefully examined by T. L. Lamb, acting for the district attorney, Hon. W. S. Hill, at the request of the said district attorney, and by Sam Cooke, one of the attorneys for the…
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
This is a ease in which stenographer’s notes having been taken, the court allowed sixty days within which they should be filed, from November 14, 1896. The bill of exceptions was not presented to or signed by the judge, but on January 25,• 1897, the counsel on both sides filed in this court their written agreement that the copy of the evidence made by the circuit clerk from the notes of the official stenographer in said cause is £ £ entirely correct. ’ ’ This is very inartificial, but we think it may be fairly treated as an agreement that the stenographer’s notes as £ £ originally filed ’ ’…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Chenault v. Adams Machine Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910