Legal Opinion

Senkel v. Fahland (In Re Fahland)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided February 8, 1990No. 11-51555PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

JAMES J. BARTA, Bankruptcy Judge.

The trial of this matter was conducted on February 5, 1990. The parties appeared by counsel and presented oral argument upon the record. Upon consideration of the oral argument, the parties’ memoranda of law, and the record as a whole, the Court announced its findings and conclusions and orders from the bench.

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(I), in that it requests a determination of the discharge-ability of a debt. An obligation can in fact be a nondischargeable debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Edward Elijah Williams, Debtor. Joyce Colleen Williams v. Edward Elijah WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Coffman v. Coffman (In Re Coffman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Anthony v. Anthony (In Re Anthony)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  3. Tavella v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  4. Holliday v. Kline (In Re Kline)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  5. Montgomery v. Montgomery (In Re Montgomery)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API