Legal Opinion

Carroll v. City of Carrollton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 2006No. A06A0777PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Tracy Carroll appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the City of Carrollton. The trial court concluded that the Recreational Property Act, OCGA § 51-3-20 et seq. (“RPA”) precludes appellant’s claims against the City. We agree and affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Anderson v. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Dowis v. Mud Slingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Risdon Enterprises, Inc. v. Colemill Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Quick v. Stone Mountain Memorial AssociationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gayle v. Frank Callen Boys & Girls Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Mercer Univ. v. StoferSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Martin v. Dempsey Funeral Services of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Collins v. City of SummervilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. THE MAYOR AND ALDERMAN OF GARDEN CITY v. HARRISSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API