Legal Opinion

Jones v. Cardoso

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 2001No. Nos. 00-55038, 00-55055; BAP Nos. CC-98-01425-BKT, CC-98-01428-BKTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

Yvonne B. Jones appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s decision granting summary judgment to defendants in Jones’ adversary proceeding alleging violation of the automatic stay in her Chapter 13 bankruptcy. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

We review decisions of the BAP de novo and independently review rulings of the bankruptcy court. See Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim (In re Kim), 130 F.3d 863, 865 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm the bankruptcy *521court’s rulings for the reasons stated in the BAP’s Memorandum of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ardmor Vending Co. v. KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API