Thomas M. Gaubert v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to further define the scope of the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act. Appellant’s case below was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We find the discretionary function exception to the Torts Claims Act inapplicable to certain of the alleged actions taken in this case. However, we find that Gaubert does not have standing to sue for the lost value of his shares, and we must dismiss that part of his suit.
Background
When deciding a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.Rule…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Branch v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Gilbert BiermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Fund, (Substituted for Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Etc.,) v. John A. Mmahat and Mmahat & Duffy, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Fund, (Substituted for Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Etc.,) Cross-Appellee v. New England Insurance Co., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Suess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.