Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel & Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 18, 1955No. 153PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question in the case is whether the Securities and Exchange Commission has jurisdiction to pass on a fee to be paid by Electric Bond & Share Co. to Drexel & Co. in connection with a reorganization plan filed by its subsidiary, Electric Power & Light Corp., under § 11 (e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 803, 15 U. S. C. § 79a et seq. We hold that the Commission does have jurisdiction.

The problem arises out of the unraveling and reorganization of the vast empire of Bond & Share, pursuant to the command of the Act. The present case is one of several phases of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Leiman v. GuttmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. In Re United Gas CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  4. In Re Electric Power & Light Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. In Re Public Service Corp. Of New Jersey. Drinker Biddle & Reath v. Securities and Exchange Commission. United Corp. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In re Standard Gas & Electric Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  4. Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API