Legal Opinion
Outterbridge v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15–1391 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;(4) the judgment is void;(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or(6) any other reason that justifies relief.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The plaintiff "bears the burden of establishing 'extraordinary circumstances' warranting relief from a final judgment." Walsh v. Hagee, 10 F.Supp.3d 15, 18 (D.D.C. 2013), quoting Schoenman v. FBI, 857…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Good Luck Nursing Home, Inc. D/B/A Magnolia Gardens Nursing Home v. Patricia R. Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gant v. Sixteenth St. Heights Dev., LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024