Legal Opinion

State v. White

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Complaint for owning and keeping intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same contrary to law. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1897, Washington County, Rowell, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment of guilty. The respondent excepted.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This was a prosecution against the respondent for owning and keeping intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same contrary to law, commenced in the city court of Barre, and appealed therefrom to the county court. The complaint was dated Sept. 18, 1896, and the offense was alleged therein to have been committed Sept. IT, 1896. No specifications were filed in the city court, nor did it appear upon what time the State there relied for conviction.

The evidence tended to show that Vermont belongs to the same Internal Revenue District as New Hampshire, and that the collector’s office is kept at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  2. Eastman v. PremoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  3. Briggs v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  4. State v. HaleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
  5. Whitney Wagon Works v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  2. State v. Coomer, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. State v. CostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
  4. Bradley v. Kelley & TrusteeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. State v. NippertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API