Legal Opinion

People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 29, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, The People of the State of Hew York,, from ah order of the Supreme Court, made..at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the ,29th day of April, 1910, denying the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite,

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

This action was brought under the provisions of section 8 of the Agricultural Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 1; Laws of 1909, chap. 9) for the recovery of certain penalties, and the plaintiff moved the court for an in junction pendente, lite under the.pro visions of section 10 of the same act, which'motion was denied, and from the order denying such motion the plaintiff appeals to this court.

Section 10 of the Agricultural Law provides that “ In an action in the Supreme Court for the recovery of a penalty or forfeiture incurred for the violation of any of the provisions, of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Simpson v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Heim v. New York Stock ExchangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashley v. Gimbel Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. Sons, New York County Courts1911
  3. People v. TeuscherNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API