Legal Opinion

State v. Dieter

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1992No. 18089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Defendant was charged with misdemean- or assault. Following nonjury trial, he was found guilty and fined $1,000. Defendant appeals.

Judgment was rendered before the time expired for defendant to file a motion for new trial under Rule 29.11. Therefore, the purported judgment was premature and void and there was no judgment from which an appeal could lie. State v. Wren, 609 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Mo.App.1980). See also State v. Ramos, 751 S.W.2d 135, 136 (Mo.App.1988).

The appeal is dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court with directions to either afford defendant the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. RamosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. DeGraffenreidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. DeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API