Legal Opinion · Dissent

Geo. A. Clark & Son, Inc. v. Nold

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1971No. File 10819Published

1DissentWollman, Judge

I cannot agree that respondents as purchasers at a bankruptcy sale have standing to avoid appellant’s lien under the provisions of 11 U.S.C.A. § 107. The authorities cited in the majority opinion seem to me to compel the conclusion that only the trustee in bankruptcy may assert invalidity of liens under the provisions of § 107.

As the majority opinion states, the purposes of § 107 is to prevent one creditor from being preferred over other creditors of a bankrupt. This being the case, I can see no reason why a purchaser at any bankruptcy sale should be permitted to invalidate liens under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Pauline Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Kobrin v. DrazinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Finney v. Knapp Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Branch v. HumanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API