Legal Opinion

Leskey v. Heath Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 9, 1980No. 49389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Defendant Heath Engineering Company appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an adverse jury verdict in a products liability action. The principal issues on appeal are whether jury findings that a product is not defective but that the manufacturer was negligent are inconsistent and whether the trial court erred in awarding plaintiff medical and hospital expenses. We conclude that the findings are not inconsistent under our holding in Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co., 268 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 1978), but that the award of medical and hospital expenses was improper. We, accordingly,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Lauscher v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Vera Randall v. Warnaco, Inc., Hirsch-Weis DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Wilken v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Charles Wilken and Laverle Wilken v. International Harvester Co., a Delaware Corporation, Traffic Transport Engineering, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Clark Transport Company, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API