Legal Opinion

Turner & Boisseau v. Kansas State Board of Healing Arts

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 24, 1998No. 78,000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Royse, J.:

Turner & Boisseau, Chartered, and Hal Meltzer (appellants) filed this action for judicial review of an agency action. The agency action they challenged was an order of sanctions imposed against them in connection with a proceeding before the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts (Board). The district court upheld the agency action, and this appeal followed. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

In early 1992 the Board initiated a disciplinary proceeding against Dr. Vinod Patel, based on allegations that he had engaged in unprofessional conduct with several women patients. Retired Judge…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zarda v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Stores v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Soza v. Kansas Department of Revenue Division of VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. In re Reno Township for Exemption from Ad Valorem TaxationCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API