Legal Opinion

Hudson v. P. J. Willis & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1894No. 193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Gebtificate of dissent from Court of Civil Appeals for First District, in an appeal from Chambers County.

1Opinion of the Court

DEKMAK, Associate Justice.

It appears from the record that Thomas F. Hudson, Sr., and his son John A. Hudson, composing the firm of Thomas F. Hudson & Son, were, prior to January, 1881, merchants at Eockdale, Texas, on which latter date they failed and made an assignment of a large stock of goods for the benefit of their creditors; that in June, 1881, the assignee sold the remnant of the stock in bulk to Kauffman & Bunge for about $10,000; that immediately after the sale the same was taken charge of and the business conducted in the same place by said Hudsons, under the name of “Thomas F.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hudson v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trinity County Lumber Co. v. DenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Trewitt v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. P. & M. Sales Co. v. Kenmare Jewelry Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API