Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 2000No. 83, Sept. Term, 1999Published

1ConcurrenceCathell, Judge

Although I concur with the result reached by the majority, I differ somewhat in how that result is reached.

While I disagree with some of the majority’s analysis of the early English history of the competency and privilege issues, I shall not take the time to take issue with their treatment of that historical perspective.

*213Section 9-101 of the Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article states that “[ujnless otherwise provided in this subtitle ... [ljitigants and their spouses are competent and compellable to give evidence.” Section 9-105 provides, however, that “[o]ne spouse is not competent to…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API