Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Prince

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 5, 1966No. 18498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

This action arose out of an automobile collision in which plaintiff, although there was no physical impact on his person, claimed to have sustained, in addition to property damage, shock which resulted in injury and damage to his nervous system with resulting disability and loss of earnings. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the amount of $7,750.00, of which the sum of $608.15 was admittedly for property damage and the remainder for damages resulting from injury to plaintiff’s nervous system. Upon the rendition of the verdict, defendant moved for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. DuffieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. Donkle v. ForsterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Collins v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. Sharpe Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Able v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Sellers v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Jolly v. Fisher Controls International, LLC and Crosby Valve, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
  5. May v. Breer Bros.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API