Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Bauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1916No. 8,960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From St. Joseph Superior Court; Fred Woodward, Judge Pro Tem. Action by Robert Bauer against William Goodman. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, P. J.

1. 2. On a complaint and answer by general denial, appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for damages received by him in a collision between an automobile driven by appellant and a motorcycle driven by appellee. Appellant has assigned as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The only ground of such motion discussed in appellant’s brief questions the correctness of instructions Nos. 8, 9J, 10 and 10J, given at the request of appellee. No attempt has been made to bring the evidence to this court. In the absence of the evidence, the trial court will not be held to have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Friebe v. ElderIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Chestnut v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Rapp v. KesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Germania Fire Insurance v. PitcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Welch v. PageIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Bingham v. Newtown BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API