Legal Opinion

Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Blitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

■ Appeal by the defendant, Henry Blitz, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 2Íst day of October,. 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the Hew York Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Houghton, J.:

The action is upon a promissory note given by the defendant June 10, 1904, to the Manufacturers’ Commercial Company, a Hew Jersey corporation, or order,' payable in one year.

The plaintiff, bearing the same name, is a Hew York corporation and is the successor of the Hew Jersey corporation,, and the complaint alleges that' it is the owner of the note in suit by assignment and transfer. This allegation of the complaint was admitted by the defendant’s answer. The note does not bear the indorsement of the payee, but was produced upon the trial by the plaintiff, and •it is fair to.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chemical National Bank v. KelloggNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Halsey v. Henry Jewett Dramatic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. South Bay Company v. . HoweyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Security Pacific National Bank v. ChessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Landis v. White Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. American Can Co. v. Grassi Contracting Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918
  5. Allison Hill Trust Co. v. SarandreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API