Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Conaghan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 3, 1999No. 98-P-315Published

1DissentDreben, J.

I depart from the majority because I conclude the defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the issue whether her plea was voluntary.

“In determining whether a ‘substantial issue’ meriting an evidentiary hearing under rule 30[1] has been raised, we look not only at the seriousness of the issue asserted, but also to the adequacy of the defendant’s showing on the issue raised.” Commonwealth v. DeVincent, 421 Mass. 64, 67 (1995), quoting from Commonwealth v. Stewart, 383 Mass. 253, 257-258 (1981). See generally Smith, Criminal Practice and Procedure *320§§ 1250-1260 (2d ed. 1983 & Supp.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fontaine v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. MorrowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. GallisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API