Legal Opinion

Doe v. Riverside School District

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01118Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JANE DOE, a minor, by her mother : Civ. No. 3:23-CV-1118 and natural guardian, Jennifer Nied, : and JENNIFER NIED, individually, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : (Magistrate Judge Bloom) : RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT, : d/b/a Riverside Junior/Senior : High School, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction This case comes before us on a motion for reconsideration filed by the plaintiffs. (Doc. 40). The plaintiffs filed this action against the Riverside School District (“the District”) and other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API