Legal Opinion

Barrell v. Holmes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1991No. 86-2006; CA A65098Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of civil contempt for failure to comply with a mandatory injunction. ORS SS.OlOdXe).1 He argues that the trial court erred, because there is no evidence that he acted with “bad intent’ ’ or that he wilfully violated the order.2 We reverse.

In November, 1987, the court enjoined defendant from violating the covenants and conditions of a subdivision that restricted the height of residences to one and one-half stories. It ordered him to remove portions of his house higher than that within 90 days. Defendant appealed to this court and filed a cost bond that stayed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. McKinley Automotive, Inc. v. OldhamOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Badger v. CoueyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API