Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Town of Calhoun

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided February 23, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATKINS, District Judge.

The General Assembly of South Carolina at its session in 1922 enacted the following joint resolution (32 Statutes at Large, p. 1530):

“A joint resolution to require the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company to furnish and maintain telephone service to the citizens of Calhoun, S. C., and Clemson College, S. C.
“Section 1. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company to furnish service at Calhoun and Clemson College. — Be it resolved by the General Assembly of the state of South Carolina: That the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company be, and it is hereby,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & NavigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
  3. Georgia Public-Service Commission v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. United States v. GervatoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Bolivar Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API