Legal Opinion
National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 11, 2007No. 06-1122PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“the Act”), parties adversely affected by an occupational safety or health standard may file a petition for review “at any time prior to the sixtieth day after such standard is promulgated.” 29 U.S.C. § 655(f). In the 1980s, the Department of Labor issued a standard prescribing hazard disclosure requirements for the chemical industry. Among other things, the standard imposes obligations based on the “latest edition” of a list of dangerous chemicals published by a private group…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dole v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Power, David F. v. Massanari, Larry G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Chamber of Commerce v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- National Oilseed Processors Ass'n v. Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Steel Erectors Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Natl Assoc Mftr v. OSHACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007