Steen & Marshall v. Harris
Supreme Court of Georgia
Debtor and creditor. Sales. Rescission. Vendor and purchaser. Attachments. Title. Before Judge Fain. Catoosa superior court. August term, 1887. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief Justice.
On November 29th, 1886, Steen & Marshall, of Knoxville, Tenn., contracted to sell to Dr. Gardner, of Ringr gold, Georgia, a piano, and delivered to him possession of the instrument. The price was $325, for which four promissory notes were given by Gardner, payable to Steen & Marshall or order, one falling due at the end of each quarter during the succeeding twelve months. It was expressed in these notes that title to the piano was retained by the sellers until full payment should be made, but the contract was not registered or recorded, as required by section 1955(a)…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Hoffman v. Franklin Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Cottrell & Sons v. Merchants & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Rhode Island Locomotive Works v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Evans Motors of Georgia Inc. v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Daniel v. BursonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.