Legal Opinion

LaHaye v. City of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 29, 1994No. 93-393-APublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing both parties to appear and to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case the plaintiff, Elizabeth Lahaye, has appealed from the granting of a motion for summary judgment for the defendant, the city of Providence (city), on the grounds of insufficient notice as required in G.L.1956 (1991 Reenactment) § 45-15-9. 1 After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument, this court concludes that cause has not been…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McPhillips v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  2. Alfano v. LandersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Marandola v. Hillcrest Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  4. Batchelder v. WhiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
  5. Maloney v. CookSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Prout v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  2. Mushnick v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Provost v. FinlaySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Frances Ahearn v. City of Providence, by and through its Finance Director, Lawrence J. Mancini.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  5. Maria Carbone v. John Ward, in his capacity as Finance Director for the Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API