Legal Opinion

Matheny v. Norton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2012No. 26166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Matheny v. Norton,

2012-Ohio-2283.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) NICHOLAS MATHENY, et al. C.A. No. 26166 Appellees v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CITY OF NORTON, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellants CASE No. CV 2011 01 0603 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: May 23, 2012 BELFANCE, Judge. {¶1} Defendants-Appellants City of Norton (“the City”) and Mayor David L. Koontz appeal the decision of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion of Plaintiffs-Appellees to compel arbitration.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maestle v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Biondi v. Oregon Homes, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Blubaugh v. Fred Martin Motors Inc., 23793 (2-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Alvarez, Wd-06-027 (6-22-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matheny v. NortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Matheny v. NortonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API