Legal Opinion

Kelderman v. Compton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1987No. 52761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Defendants/third-party plaintiffs, Ted L. Kelderman and Beverly D. Kelderman, his wife, (Keldermans) appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their petition filed against third-party defendant, Donald Compton (Compton). At issue is whether the third-party claim of the Keldermans comes within the provisions of Rule 52.11 and is therefore sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. We hold that the pleading was sufficient and reverse and remand.

The facts, as gleaned from the pleadings, are that the Keldermans entered into an oral contract with Compton for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hertel Electric Company v. GabrielMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. S. P. Personnel Associates of San Antonio, Inc. v. Hospital Building & Equipment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. AAA Excavating, Inc. v. Francis Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Green v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Ashcroft v. GibbarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tharp v. Keeter/Schaefer Investments, L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API