Legal Opinion

Fackenthall v. Wight

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1931No. Appeal 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This was an action of trespass, begun in Carbon County by capias ad respondendum, against Paul S. Wight to recover damages alleged to have resulted to plaintiff from an automobile collision occurring in Carbon County. Bail was fixed at $500. The sheriff of Carbon County deputized the sheriff of Luzerne County to serve the capias, together with a copy of the statement of claim. The sheriff of Luzerne County made return by endorsement on the writ, “that he served the within capias ad respondendum, together with plaintiff’s statement of claim, on Paul S. Wight on the 29th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maloney v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Barber & Co. v. Scranton Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Fitler v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. White v. FitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  5. Cummings v. Meeker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1837

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Null v. StaigerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Meehan v. Baldwin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1936
  3. Stinson v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API