Legal Opinion
Breitenfeld v. SAS Institute, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided October 28, 2004No. 05-04-00131-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice LANG.
In this action, John W. Breitenfeld appeals the summary judgment rendered against him and in favor of SAS Institute, Inc., his former employer, which required him to refund $49,443.50 of sales bonus payments. Specifically, on appeal, Breit-enfeld claims that: (1) the trial court erred in granting SAS’s motion for summary judgment; and (2) the trial court erred in denying Breitenfeld’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set out below, we reverse and render in part, and affirm in part, the trial court’s judgment.
1. Procedural History of the Case
SAS sued…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Enterprise, Inc. v. E.N.E. Properties, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Miller v. Monumental Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Aspen Technology, Inc. v. Applied Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2008
- Breitenfeld v. SAS Institute, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- James R. Winn, M.D. v. Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States, Incorporated, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.