Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Gilmore

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2001No. 00-1185Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKing, Circuit Judge

I am pleased to concur in nearly all of the fine opinion authored by my friend Judge Hamilton. I part company with him solely on the issue concerning the propriety of this suit being maintained against Governor Gilmore, and I respectfully dissent on that point. In determining that the Governor is not a proper party to this action, the majority, in my view, erroneously concludes that “[t]he fact that he has publicly endorsed and defended the *351challenged statutes does not alter our analysis.” Ante, at 331. The majority instead posits that our resolution of this question rests on whether his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Okpalobi v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. Lytle v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. GilmoreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API