Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1981No. Civ. 51777PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

Petitioner Maurice Keenan, who is charged with a capital offense, seeks a writ of mandate compelling respondent superior court to grant petitioner’s motions 1) to discover the prosecution’s policy regarding the charging of “special circumstances” (Pen. Code, § 190.2), 2) to have an independent and confidential analysis of physical evidence performed by defense criminalists, and 3) to order the prosecution to advise petitioner of the specific evidence that the prosecution intends to introduce in aggravation of the sentence at the penalty phase of trial pursuant to section 190.3…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API