Legal Opinion

Pietranico v. Ambach

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1982PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard A. Weiss at the Appellate Division (82 AD2d 625), based on the bare record before us.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judges Fuchsberg and Meyer *863dissent in part and vote to modify by reducing the punishment imposed to censure for the reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion by former Justice J. Clarence Herlihy at the Appellate Division (82 AD2d 625, 627-628).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pietranico v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alaimo v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Baman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. New York City Board of Education v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Mujtaba v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Ward v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API