Legal Opinion

In Re Roxy Roller Rink Joint Venture

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 3, 1985No. 13-20008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SUSTAINING STANDING OF PETITIONING PARTNER

PRUDENCE B. ABRAM, Bankruptcy Judge.

On October 17, 1984, Natoma-Roxy Corp. (“Natoma”) filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against Roxy Roller Rink Joint Venture (“Roxy” or the “Debtor”). Nato-ma alleged that it is one of the general partners of Roxy, a joint venture that operates a roller rink and disco at 515 West 18th Street, New York City. Twins Roller Corp. (“Twins”) is alleged to be the other general partner. The petition alleges that the Debtor is generally not paying its debts as they become due. An amended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weisman v. Awnair Corp. of Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Pedersen v. Manitowoc Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Ross v. WillettNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. John's, Inc. v. Island Garden Center of Nassau, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1966
  5. In Re York Furniture Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Trina AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991
  2. In Re Roxy Rollier Rink Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Twins Roller Corp. v. Roxy Roller Rink Joint Venture (In Re Roxy Roller Rink Joint Venture)District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Rice v. Carlton Farms, LLC (In re Webb)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012
  5. Skybridge Spectrum FoundationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API