Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1924No. 34-36PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Since 1905 appellant has been the sole producer and general distributor of heating and illuminating gas in the San Francisco district. By three separate ordinances passed in June of 1913,1914 and 1915, the Board of Supervisors directed it to supply such gas during the fiscal year commencing July first thereafter at not more than seventy-five cents per thousand feet. . Claiming that the rate so prescribed would not yield fair return, appellant brought suits in July, 1913, 1914 and 1915, to prevent enforcement of the respective ordinances. Restraining orders issued upon condition that monthly…

2Cited by61 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Burnet v. Niagara Falls Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Washington Gas Light Co. v. Baker. Public Utilities Commission of District of Columbia v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API