Legal Opinion

Whitely v. Bartlett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 1933No. Gen. No. 36,059Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

By this appeal Charles H. Bartlett, Walter Deemer and L. Percy Owen, defendants, seek the reversal of a judgment against themselves and Leslie Gr. Arries, in a suit on a promissory note given by all the defendants and payable to plaintiff. Arries defaulted. The judgment is upon the verdict of a jury.

To the declaration filed in the case, the defendants appealing filed pleas of non assumpsit and of payment and an affidavit of merits, in which it is alleged that the money obtained from plaintiff on the note sued on was loaned by plaintiff to Leslie Gr. Arries; that Arries, without instruction or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Voss v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Weston v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Shipley v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Merritt v. A. W. Boyden & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API