Legal Opinion

People v. Richmond

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 2003No. 1-01-1656 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

THIRD DIVISION

May 28, 2003

No. 1-01-1656

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) APPEAL FROM THE) CIRCUIT COURT OF

Plaintiff-Appellee, ) COOK COUNTY.))

v. ))

SAMUEL RICHMOND, ) HONORABLE) EDWARD M. FIALA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. ) JUDGE PRESIDING.

2Opinion of the Court · WolfsonJustice Wolfson

Among the matters to be decided in this predatory criminal sexual assault case is the State's suggestion that we abandon the requirement that the occurrence of a crime cannot be established solely by a defendant's uncorroborated confession -- the corpus delicti rule.

The issue arises from a jury verdict finding Samuel Richmond guilty of two counts of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. SimmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API