Legal Opinion

Robert Cordaro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 5, 2019No. 18-1022PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

In 2011, Robert Cordaro was convicted of bribery, extortion, and racketeering, along with other crimes. At his trial, the court instructed the jury that those crimes required an "official act." In 2016, however, the Supreme Court clarified what does - and does not - constitute an "official act" in McDonnell v. United States , --- U.S. ----, 136 S. Ct. 2355 , 195 L.Ed.2d 639 (2016). Cordaro believes that the McDonnell decision makes his conduct noncriminal and so petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . The District Court correctly concluded that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Steven Voneida v. John JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  2. Christopher Rad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Christopher Rad v. Warden Pike County CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  4. Cruz v. EbbertDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. DAVIS v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API