City of Sacramento v. Jensen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
The city of Sacramento, respondent herein, claiming to be the owner of an easement over certain lands, brought this action against appellants Charles T. Jensen and wife. The city alleged that since May 9, 1927, Blair Avenue, as shown on the official plat of Victory Acres filed in the office of the county recorder of Sacramento County on April 26, 1927, has been a public highway or street; that originally the easement for public use had been vested in the county of Sacramento, and that by annexation proceedings the territory embracing said avenue had become a part of the respondent city so…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Stump v. Cornell Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sessions, Inc., a California Corporation v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hays v. VanekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Scott v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.