Legal Opinion

Caddell Construction Company v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 17, 2016No. 15-914CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Post-award Bid Protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Procurement; Subcontracting; Key Management Personnel; Responsiveness; Subcontractor Responsibility; 48 C.F.R. § 9.104-4.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This post-award bid protest comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the Administrative Record (“AR”). Plaintiff, Caddell Construction Company (“Caddell”), challenges the Department of State, Bureau of Overseas Building Operations’ (“DOS”) award of a contract to Frama-co…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 2m Research Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Ekagra Partners, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  3. Sallyport Global Services, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API