Legal Opinion
United States v. Miguel Peglera
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1994No. 93-5939PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge ANDERSON joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
The question in this case is whether the government violated the terms of appellant’s plea agreement, thereby requiring us to remand the ease for specific performance of that agreement. Because the government failed to honor promises that were expressly stated in the plea agreement, we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing.
I
On March 24, 1993, a federal grand jury returned a nine-count indictment against…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Robert Nathaniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Robert Mark FentressCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Ismail Kurkculer, A/K/A George MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Troy Vaval, AKA Justice VavalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Frederick BryeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Richard LawlorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Brandon TateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.