Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Lapidem Ltd. (In re Kirwan Offices S.À.R.L.)
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 10, 2018No. 17 Civ. 4339 (CM), 17 Civ. 4340 (CM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColleen McMAHON, Chief Judge
Appellant Stephen P. Lynch ("Appellant" or "Lynch"), pro se , brings this appeal from the order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York Approving and Confirming the Combined First Amended Plan of Reorganization of Debtor Kirwan Offices S.à.r.l. ("Debtor" or "Kirwan"). The reorganization plan was proposed by Appellees Lapidem Ltd. ("Lapidem") and Mascini Holdings Limited ("Mascini," and together with Lapidem, the "Appellees"), unsecured creditors of Kirwan.
For the reasons set forth below, the Bankruptcy Court's order is AFFIRMED.
I. Factual Background
a.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Buckskin Realty, Inc. v. GreenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- CHRISTOPHER F. GRAHAM, as Plan Administrator of th v. Driscoll Foods, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- CHRISTOPHER F. GRAHAM, as Plan Administrator of th v. Zeze Food Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Campos v. Aegis Realty Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Culligan Ltd. and Michael MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.