Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 18, 1989No. Record No. 0189-87-4PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KEENAN, J.

Jeffrey T. Smith was convicted in a bench trial of leaving the scene of an accident in violation of Code § 46.1-176. 1 The issues presented in this appeal are: (1) whether the evidence is sufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction; and (2) whether Smith had reasonable notice that the accident made him subject to the requirements of Code § 46.1-176. We find that the evidence was sufficient to convict Smith under the language of the statute and that he had reasonable notice that he was subject to its provisions. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction.

I

The evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Crews v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Lamarr Ramon Masean Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
  4. Stacy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Milazzo v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API