Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Sansbury

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 26, 1932No. 13334PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

With slight variations, we adopt the statement of facts agreed to by the parties to the appeal. This action, brought in Darlington County, was an ordinary one for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage executed by the defendant J. Baxter Sansbury. Lamont T. Sansbury, his son, as the holder of a junior mortgage, was made a party defendant; S. H. Young, as receiver of the Bank of Timmonsville, was made a defendant as the holder of a judgment against J. Baxter Sansbury; this judgment being of later date than plaintiff’s mortgage.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Herndon v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. Alexander v. MesserveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  4. Ex Parte CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  5. Farrow v. FarrowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Ex Parte MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API