Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 27, 1809PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION- of the Court, by

Judge Bibb.

— In covenant, Craig set forth, that by articles of agreement made on the 20th of October 1803, between Marshall and himself, it was witnessed, that the plaintiff sold to the defendant, a certain parcel of land which he had purchased out of a claim of Charles Pelham, which land was also covered by two other claims, viz. of John *380Craig, and of Hezekiah Briscoe, heir of John Briscoe, all of which, the involved and involving claims, the said plaintiff on his part engaged to unite, and sold to the defendant to a certain extent, reserving certain parcels as…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate Of Kenneth Stewart RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Estate of Riddle Ex Rel. Riddle v. Southern Farm Bureau Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Empson Packing Co. v. ClawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Smith v. LipscombTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Johnson v. TackittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API