Intermountain Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentCrockett, Chief Justice
The court’s opinion evades the issue which is the foundation of the case: i. e., the constitutionality of the ordinance.
Gold Cross in the court below challenged the validity of the ordinance. From an adverse ruling it took this appeal. I do not find anything in the record before this court to indicate that the question is moot. Subsequent to the judgment below, and after the appeal to this court, plaintiffs counsel lodged with this court an unsigned document titled “Affidavit” stating that Gold Cross has since obtained a certificate under the ordinance. There are two reasons why this court…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Heitmuller v. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- LeGrand Johnson Corporation v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Laurens County v. KeenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Arthur Earl Robbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.