Legal Opinion

Felt v. Reynolds Rotary Fruit Evaporating Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1884PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennisou, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, C. J".

Felt, suing in his own right and also as assignee of Joseph Griswold, brings 'suit on the contract evidenced by the following papers:

“To the Reynolds Fruit Evaporating Company, Detroity Mich. — Gentlemen: You will please furnish us one of your evaporators, size No.. 2, for which we agree to pay $1200 twelve hundred dollars; of this amount one-fourth is to be paid in cash upon the setting up of the machine, ready to operate, and one-fourth in ninety days, with interest after thirty days, and one-half to be jriid in dried apples put in new barrels and delivered at the depot in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Final v. BackusMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Dickinson v. SeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Grant v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Brady v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Brush v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Parish v. B F Goodrich Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Weeks v. Slavik Builders, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Weeks v. Slavik Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Southern California Enterprises, Inc. v. D. N. & E. Walter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Showen v. J. L. Owens Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API